Law of Nature | The Manifesto

Initiatives waste their time and resources on overcoming mountains of obstacles

Available solutions of the high(est) impact get stuck in the system by default

Our long-standing approaches to solving the growing problems we face failed us

An enormous solution potential is waiting to be unleashed 

Bureaucracy and fixed ways of thinking prevent us from unlocking it

After 2+ Decades of Failed Solution Attempts

The only solution powerfull enough may be ...

Emile van Essen, Founding Chair of World Sustainability Fund:

As far as I know, this is the only initiative worldwide responding to the following at the level required:

  1. What prevents us from unleashing the available solutions?
  2. Where and how do we have to intervene to unleash the solutions of high-to-highest impact within the deadlines set by Nature and deadlines agreed on by international treaties?

Patterns Standing Out

Across fields, industries, and challenges, we now observe common patterns: 

1. Solutions that delivered the needed results where our long-standing approaches failed us

2. Gaps and conflicts that prevent us from implementing solutions with high-to-highest impact

3. Fresh approaches to resolve these gaps and conflicts

We Are All Part of Nature

Nature provides powerful guidance to change our daily decision-making from unconsciously fueling todays problems to solving them 

Throughout hierarchies

At work and at home

For initiatives

Universally Applicable

Laws of Nature, lessons learned,
practices and solutions

Hard-to-ignore questions guiding to solutions of high-to-highest impact

  • Aviation
  • Business services
  • Construction
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Health Services
  • IT
  • Public services
  • Manufacturing
  • Science
  • Social enterprises

     And more

  • Agility 
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • Best practices & Methods
  • Education
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Human Resources
  • Indigenous knowledge
  • Innovation
  • Knowledge Management
  • Land use
  • Management
  • Natural Earth Systems
  • Organisations
  • Politics
  • Project management
  • Research
  • SDGs1
  • Societal matters
  • Youth & Children

      And more

  • Agile yet reliable decision-making
  • Artificial Intelligence: Downside prevention
  • Automation
    • Beneficial versus counterproductive 
  • Bureaucracy & Complexity reduction
  • Cooperation & Co-creation
  • Circular economies: Making them happen
  • Education and skill gaps
  • Fixed ways of thinking & Behaviour
  • Food security
  • Health of
    • People
    • Projects, organizations and  environments
    • Planet
  • Innovation
    • High(est)-impact getting stuck by default
    • Out-of-the-box, social and organizational  
  • Marine life
  • Safety
  • Security
  • Trust: (Re-)creating trust
  • Truth finding
  • Productivity improvements
  • Project failure rates far to high
  • SDGs1
  • Social and organisational innovation needs
  • Water security

       And more

Gap 1: 

What needs to be done DIFFERENTLY to unleash the enormous solution potential available today?

Gap 2: 

No one identified working on or willing to address the following gaps to the required levels:

What do decision-makers REALLY NEED to make the problem-solving decisions?

In TODAY’s world, what do initiative owners, innovators, experts, and project managers REALLY NEED to make their solutions executable, scalable, and durable at the SYSTEM LEVEL?

What delivered the needed results where our long-standing solutions failed us?

What delivered the HIGHEST IMPACT at the LOWEST COSTS and RISKS at the SYSTEM LEVEL?

Gap 3: 

Demands and calls for action lacking executability in today’s world

High-level demands and calls from movements, initiatives, and institutions

versus

Decision-makers, their advisors and experts missing the education, experience and knowledge to resolve gaps 1 & 2

1. 

The Manifesto

INTERVENING where the HIGHEST IMPACT can be made at the LOWEST COSTS and RISKS

2. 

The Manifesto’s Guidance PackageShort Video Tutorials

To close the knowledge, experience and solution gap for solving complex problems

3. 

A Call-to-Action Video Series: Hard-to-Ignore Questions Anyone Can Ask On the Fly

The questions:

  • Target situations where the highest impact can be made 
  • Guide decision-makers, experts, and other groups toward effective solutions – such as relevant Laws of Nature

The Law of Nature ManifestoTM

For Solving Complex Problems

INTERVENTION POSSIBILITIES of the HIGHEST IMPACT at the LOWEST COSTS and RISKS

Law of Nature | The Manifesto

1.

Let go of the thinking that created the growing problems. Keep what works well: what works well and fresh approaches complement each other for far-reaching effects.

Patterns of what communicates “too much of the same thinking that created the growing problems”

  • Splitting complex problems into parts: Makes causes and impactful solutions outside the addressed parts invisible
  • Money-based decisions and methods overruling relevant Laws of Nature, Core Human Values, and Essential Behaviours
  • Jumping from failed approaches to opposite approaches while:
    • Both failing to listen to what is really needed to solve the problems
    • Well-working parts of the dropped approaches get lost and need to be ‘re-invented’
  • Assuming that what worked in a world gone by will work in today’s world:
    • While the guidance for why they fail in today’s world and how they can be made to work is missing
    • Examples: ‘Break into parts, start small, and grow’; best practices; movements, etc. 

The Manifesto’s approach: 

See the 8 intervention possibilities of this Manifesto

2.

Listen to what delivered the needed results where our long-standing solution approaches failed us

3.

Intervene where the highest impact can be made at the lowest costs and risks™ AT THE SYSTEM LEVEL

After 2+ decades of failed solution attempts, large groups have learned to intuitively recognize when a new solution attempt or movement applies too much of the same thinking that created the growing problems. They respond with a lack of interest and support or opposition.  

Common patterns of ‘the same thinking that created the problems’ include:

  • Complex problems are broken into parts, but only a few parts receive priority and funding, while causes located outside the addressed parts receive no priority nor resources. 
  • Relevant Laws of Nature are missing or overruled. 
  • Every complex environment is different. Yet, it is assumed that what worked in a small environment, earlier or elsewhere, will work in the particular environment. 
  • Lessons learned are lost and re-learned again and again.
  • Movements, methods, frameworks and the like assume that people in target audiences can find problem-solving solutions to highly complex problems while they do not have the necessary training, knowledge, and experiences.

Hard Laws of Nature, typically available from physics, mathematics, chemistry, and biology cannot be overruled or ignored. Nature does not allow it. Yet, it happens day in and day out, resulting in huge damage, such as crippling bureaucracy, available solutions getting stuck in the system, resistance, and violent opposition. Several of the same laws provide practices to intervene where the highest impact can be made at the lowest costs and risks AT THE SYSTEM LEVELS. That’s without worrying about mathematics and across industries, fields, and challenges.

A simple introduction of the two Laws of Nature almost certain to occur in complex environments is available through the Manifesto Tutorials 1 & 2 of the Guidance Package of Intervention 4. 

One word, derived from two Laws of Nature, is bound to provide the highest-impact solution at the lowest cost and risk for the crippling bureaucracy and overwhelming complexity. It prevents decision-makers and experts from unconsciously fueling bureaucracy and enables them to select practices that reduce bureaucracy, resistance, and opposition.

How this word can be applied is available via the Guidance Package of Intervention 4, Tutorial 3.3: One Word to Make …

4.

Resolve the knowledge-experience-solution gap of how complex problems can be solved by TREATING IT AS A SINGLE GAP

With the growing problems being complex and the long-standing solution attempts having failed us for 2+ decades, it has become evident that the gap of how to solve complex problems must be resolved with a fresh approach. 

When the Manifesto’s co-creators could not find any group, institute, or organisation addressing or taking on this matter at the required levels in the field, they took it on. Highest-impact knowledge from science and experiences with what delivered needed results where our long-standing approaches failed us, led to an extension of this closing-the-gap intervention and a Guidance Package of surprisingly short video tutorials. 

5.

Get solution possibilities EARLY ON over the Tipping Point where they become executable, scalable, and durable at the SYSTEM LEVEL

The Guidance Package of Intervention 4 includes a fresh approach to get over this Tipping Point EARLY ON. This approach is available through Tutorial 3.4.2When, despite the efforts, it remains unclear how this Tipping Point can be crossed, foreseeable failure can be prevented by:

  • Reducing the ambition to something achievable
  • First executing the enterprise or system-wide project of Intervention 8
  • Stopping the initiative or putting it on hold until the time is right

It is clear how the system level can be achieved and this is part of the identified approach. Differences with the long-lasting but failed approach of ‘start small, scale up (and get stuck)’ are: 

  • Many obstacles are out of the way from the beginning
  • Solving further obstacles is integral to the project design and can be addressed before they hit
  • Resistance and opposition are (much) lower as many obstacles are out of the way    
  • Instead of ongoing firefighting, project members can focus on what provides value 
  • The identified solution may involve a (small) percentage of the effort and costs normally seen   

Scalability and system-level needs can be dropped when the problem to solve is within a small environment and the following criteria are met:

  • The individuals involved (and impacted) know and see each other regularly
  • The following criteria are in balance with each other:
    • External dependencies are well understood, addressed, and proactively resolved when they create new  damage outside the small environment
    • The value1 created by the solution within the small environment is greater than the new damage the changes may cause outside

The early-on need can be dropped when the criteria for a small environment are met, and the analysts and solution designers are highly experienced in the cross-disciplinary knowledge and solution possibibilites of this Manifesto. 

1 Value includes non-financial value such reducing (virtual) capacity bottlenecks like those of skill shortages, productivity improvement from motivated employees, and clients trusting vendors and institutions

6.

Ignite the PROBLEM-SOLVING thinking by asking THE SAME HARD-TO-IGNORE questions which guide DECISION-MAKERS and EXPERTS to the HIGHEST-IMPACT SOLUTIONS

Examples

When decisions are to be made, the following questions can be asked:

The Manifesto’s collection of HARD-TO-IGNORE questions guiding to HIGHEST-IMPACT SOLUTIONS

Under development

Our collection is under development. Various such questions are available near the end of each Manifesto Tutorial.

7.

Verify decisions against relevant Laws of Nature, Core Human Values, Essential Behaviours and Value Cases

Decisions with far-reaching consequences are made day in and day out. Decision-making is the ‘place’ where the difference between fueling or solving the growing problems we face is made.

Manifesto Tutorials 1, 2, and 3.2 of the above-mentioned Guidance Package identify:

  • Why we are trapped in problem-fuelling decision-making
  • How this trap led to an exponential growth of bureaucracy and complexity
  • Why this situation is undermining ‘everything’ we do

Tutorial 3.3 identifies how a single word, derived from two Laws of Nature, opens the door to get out of this trap and how this drastically reduces bureaucracy and complexity.

Until the late 1990s, decision-making was based on a combination of numerical and pattern-based information1. Thereafter, it was believed that decisions should be predominantly based on hard information such as numbers, dollars, and euros, along with step-by-step proof. However, this approach only works up to the Tipping Point of complexity, and this critical limitation was overlooked. Beyond this Tipping Point, even mathematics cannot provide reliable outcomes.

Missing this limitation led to pattern-based information being overlooked and overruled by numerical and bureaucratic requirements, resulting in the LOSS OF A STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION FOR SOLVING COMPLEX PROBLEMS –More on this and the following is available throughout the Guidance Package and in particular Tutorials 1, 2, 3.2 and 3.3.

1 Creating patterns is how our brains makes sense out of complex information.

Initially

  • While managers believed they were following state-of-the-art practices, so-called management mistakes became common occurances
  • The problem-fuelling trap identified under ‘Why verification simplifies’ above and its devastating consequences developed

Large groups learned to recognise when  

  • An element of trust and integrity failed: Delivering to a promise remained more important than adjusting to new insights or changed situations (an agility requirement)
  • Methods, theories, and practices, designed for recurring situations failed as, in complex environments, every situation can or will be different
  • The new approaches of agility and self-organisation failed for higher levels of complexity as executable guidance was missing (exceptions granted)

The situation escalated

Large groups withdrew their support from the establishment and backed other movements, even if it meant creating an additional dimension of problems, and moving us further away from solving the exponentially growing problems. 

Over the past two decades, we have seen many attempts to solve this decision-making gap, such as demanding ethics, value-based decisions, regulations, and the like. Even if they are brought in line with the relevant Laws of Nature and further elements of this Manifesto, it remains hard to see how they can be made executable during decision-making processes and provide the value required. This led to these needs:

1. Value Cases need to complement business cases 
2. A set of Core Human Values & Essential Behaviours is required:

  • Short enough to be remembered 
  • Suited for quick alignment verification during decision-making processes

If needed, they can be complemented with executable elements of ethics, regulations and the like. 

Core Human Values, Essential Behaviours and a Value Case approach are available through the extension to this intervention.

8.

Consider one enterprise or system-wide project removing mountains of obstacles

Across industries, fields, and subjects, a common pattern emerged

High-to-highest-impact strategies, solutions, projects and the like are undermined and get stuck by the same obstacles, such as the obstacles of bureaucracy, complexity, and practices of a world gone by. These obstacles are usually outside the sphere of influence of these strategies, solutions and projects, and hiding below the surface. To create powerful strategies, make hidden solutions visible, and unleash their value potential, an enterprise or system-wide project aimed at removing these obstacles may be necessary.

Example: Simplification project –Good intention, but worsening the problem

What do we do when environments become too bureaucratic or complex? We start simplification projects in a few boxes. However, bureaucracy at the system level easily increases more than it is reduced within these boxes. This happens when the damage created from the changes outside the boxes exceeds the value created inside. In our connected world, it worsens when different groups chose different solutions and drift in different directions.   

More on this and the simple solution are available in Tutorials 3.2 and 3.3, as well as in section 3.4 of the Guidance Package.

  • One word, derived from two Laws of Nature, is bound to provide the most powerful solution for drastically reducing the unnecessary bureaucracy. How this word can be used and easily integrated into decision-making processes is available through Tutorial 3.3 of the Manifesto’s Guidance Package.
  • Designing and executing this project with a small team should be far more effective than using a large team.
  • Implementation starts by training and coaching key personnel
    • Those trained and coached should, in turn, coach others as part of their daily activities
    • Key personnel typically include higher-level decision-makers, their advisors, strategists, senior innovation and project managers, and senior solution designers
  • Implementation uses the existing bureaucracy and natural process flows to speed up implementation and reduce project costs 

V2.0, Jan 2025

Manifesto Extension to Intervention 4:

Resolve the Knowledge, Solution, and Experience Gap of
How Complex Problems Can Be Solved

4.A.

Practices for analysing complex problems and designing impactful solutions

When we understand where the highest damage is created, we have guidance on where the highest-impact can be made. Further patterns became:  

  • Analysis paralysis can be prevented 
  • The overload of information, lessons learned, symptoms and methods can be reduced to manageable levels 
  • Various so-called wicked problems turned out to be solvable

With the growing problems we face, humanity can no longer afford to miss out on fundamental principles of science. 

Yet, WHEN PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED WERE COMPLEX, the Manifesto’s co-creators could not find anyone working with or responding to applying the following principles of science, neither in organisations nor in science itself. Typical responses were “doesn’t fit my discipline,” “what’s a Law of Nature?” or no response at all. 

The following principles urgently need to be (re-)integrated into decision-making, research, strategy design, innovation processes, and much more:

  • SEEK THE TRUTH
    • Identify what decision-makers REALLY NEED to make problem-solving decisions
    • Identify what initiative owners REALLY NEED to get high-to-highest-impact solutions through the system
  • IDENTIFY AND APPLY LAWS of NATURE relevant IN COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS
    • Especially when they cannot be expressed in exact ways, which is common in complex environments
    • Like Darwin did, various laws need to be expressed in phrases or sentences when they cannot be expressed in exact ways   

Experience: A small number of such laws can have a huge problem-solving impact

  • APPLY the EINSTEIN-NEWTON-DARWIN PRACTICES
    • Utilise the key practices they applied to find deep insights to highly complex challenges and Laws of Nature
    • These key practices are available through Tutorials 1 and 2 of the Manifesto’s Guidance Package

Example of where these principles were applied: this Manifesto

The following practices emerged as foundations for re-creating trust. To make it happen, relevant practices may need to be part of a larger package designed to get over the Tipping Point where the package becomes executable, scalable, and durable at the system level (Intervention 5): 

  • Listen to and deliver what decision-makers, employees and initiative owners REALLY NEED to make the problem-solving decisions or get their job done in normal ways
  • Co-create with representatives of all groups involved and impacted
    • Small co-creation teams of knowledgeable representatives of the groups appear to be (far) more effective than large teams
    • Small teams may find solutions large teams cannot find
  • Provide Laws of Nature that cannot be expressed in exact ways, Core Human Values and Essential Behaviours in the most condensed form possible so they can be
    • Understood and applied by professionals unfamiliar with the subject at hand
    • Remembered

For Core Human Values and Essential Behaviours, see Manifesto Extention to Intervention 7

  • Verify important decisions against RELEVANT LAWS of NATURE, CORE HUMAN VALUES, and ESSENTIAL BEHAVIOURS
  • Apply Manifesto Interventions 1 to 8 
  • Provide SIMPLE solution elements that COMPLEMENT EACH OTHER for far-reaching spin-off effects and highest impact

This is to enable people of various groups, fields and subjects to move into a common direction and act as a single entity

  • A single entity can be a project, movement, institution, company or a system like health services

The guidance

  • Is provided in a highly concentrated form, yet reasonably complete to make problem-solving decisions or a real difference
  • Contains simple but complementary solution elements for far-reaching impact
  • Uses simple language to ensure people unfamiliar with vocabulary of different groups, fields, and subjects can understand each other
  • Is reasonably complete to help users get their solutions and projects over the Tipping Point of Intervention 5 above

4.B.

From the Manifesto and the Guidance Package, select what is relevant

Knowledgeable representatives of the groups involved and impacted decide TOGETHER what is relevant and will be used. The rest can be ignored.

Other solution elements you or the groups involved and impacted may have, as well as third-party guidance packages can be used, provided they:

  • Align with other Manifesto elements identified as RELEVANT  
  • Complement the selected solutions
  • Are equally effective or better

4.C.

Integrate relevant guidance into decision-making at all levels, problem analysis, solution design, innovation processes and Best Practices 

  • Training and coaching of key personnel in relevant Manifesto elements
    • Key personnel typically include higher-level decision-makers, their advisors, strategists, senior innovation and project managers, and senior solution designers
  • Creating highest-level policies that override, for example, rules in conflict with relevant Laws of Nature
    • More on this and a policy example are available in Manifesto Tutorial 3.3
  • Making further coaching of employees a ‘natural’ part of decision-making processes
    • Ideally, this should be carried out by the key personnel already trained and coached

4.D.

Create complementary research and innovation processes

Based on:

  • The fundamental principles of science under Intervention 4.A above
  • The problem-solving practices of individuals like Steve Jobs (iPhone / smartphone), Jacinda Ardern (former Prime Minister of New Zealand, compassion and leadership style) 
  • Technical and NON-technical innovation 
  • Value creation over bureaucratic requirements; value includes non-monetary value like the health of the people, organisation, environment, or planet

Funded by:

  • Reducing today’s high failure rates of innovation and research projects by applying relevant elements of this Manifesto, such as the fundamental principles of science under Intervention 4.A and establishing executability per Intervention 5 early on 
  • Moving, for example, 30% of today’s innovation and research budgets to these processes

For more information, see Manifesto’s Tutorial 3.4.4

Manifesto Extension to Intervention 7:

Core Human Values, Essential Behaviours, Value Cases & Hard-to-Ignore Questions

7.A.

Core Human Values

Health

This is the health of the people, organisation, environment and the planet1

As health requires biodiversity, it includes a healthy biodiversity

Safety

Includes climate and peace1

Basic Needs

Clean water and air, shelter, food, and energy1

Truth Seeking

What may be seen as the truth today can change over time. Establishing truth can be challenging. That’s why this value is truth seeking.

Freedom by being in harmony with each other

Everyone should be able to live freely. However, the freedom of one person ends where the freedom, health, or safety of another person begins.

1 Based on “Sustainocracy: The new democracy.” Jean-Paul Close.  https://sustainocracy.blog/what-is-sustainocracy/

7.B.

Essential Behaviours

Act With Adaptive IntegrityTM

We give our word (a promise, commitment, etc.) when we have sufficient confidence that we can keep our word. As soon as we know that we cannot keep our word, we inform all parties counting on us and clean up any mess that we caused in their lives. 1, 2

People, objects (organisations, products, services, etc.), and systems are IN or OUT of INTEGRITY.3

1 Integrity: Without it Nothing Works. Jensen, Michael C. Harvard Business School. Jesse Isidor Straus Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus. April 6, 2014. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1511274 
2 First sentence adjusted to meet an executability need
3 Seminar. Jensen, Michael C. Erasmus University, Rotterdam. 2011. 

Be Authentic

Be yourself

Seek the Truth

  • Exploring multiple perspectives
  • Authentic listening
  • Constructive criticism
  • Responding to new insights and changing situations
  • Respecting each other
  • Questioning oneself: Is this the truth or do I want it to be the truth?

Listen Authentically

  • Avoiding prejudgement
  • Do those listened to have the feeling they are fully understood?
  • What can I do or must I do with what I have heard or learned?
  • Is the person or group listened to given sufficient time and means to contribute their views? 

Of course, this cannot mean listen to everybody and everything. Such approaches would quickly be in conflict with the Tipping Point and Capacity Bottleneck Laws of Nature. As such conflicts occur, a switch to other practices is required, like those most relevant to everybody, which brings us to the Core Human Values and Essential Behaviours provided here. A further practice is that of co-creation on equal terms, and with knowledgeable representatives of the groups involved and impacted.

Learn From Failure

In complex environments failure is guaranteed to happen as every situation can or will be different and the ‘unexpected unexpected’ keeps popping up. The following pattern surfaced: Learning from failure and an attitude of preventing the same failure from re-occuring reduces failure rates structurally.  

Take Ownership

Personal responsibility and accountability

Within boundaries, individuals and teams are given the freedom and means to solve complex problems:

  • Only a few goals and boundaries are agreed on with the owners and senior experts of the analysis and solution design team(s)
  • Individual’s knowledgeable and experienced in a field AND individuals who have demonstrated to have found solutions that delivered needed results in multiple fields can or will complement each other for optimum effect
  • The Analysts, solution designers and project owners are educated in
    • How to design solutions that are executable, scalable, and durable at the system level
    • Resolving gaps and conflicts in today’s solution thinking
    • Co-creation on equal terms with representatives of all groups involved and impacted

7.C.

Like Business Cases identify high-to-highest impact information in the form of numbers, Value Cases do the same with patterns.

Patterns are reliable practices because creating patterns is how our brains make sense of complex information. A benefit is that we do not have to go through endless discussions, for example, on agreeing on definitions. Everybody can have a somewhat different view. As long as we understand each other, decisions can be made.

Examples of patterns:

  • Illustrations
  • Words, phrases, sentences and the like
  • Emotions like those creating interest and support versus those emotions creating lack of interest and opposition
  • Worsening or improving situations
  • Hidden costs

With the numbers AND patterns at hand, hard-to-ignore Guiding Questions such as those in the following dropdown box, and in the collection of Manifesto Intervention 6 are responded to. 

When decisions are to be made

Does the decision improve or worsen the health of the people, organisation, environment, or planet?

When stress, burnout rates, or cost saving-pressures are high

When productive employees are laid off

When decisions are made

Where is the project to reduce the unnecessary bureaucracy and complexity to healthy levels by applying the Tipping Point and Capacity Bottleneck Laws of Nature (more in Tutorials 1, 2 to 3.3)?

On Adaptive Integrity

Is the person, group, organisation or system IN, or OUT of INTEGRITY? 

Is the object (i.e. a product), solution, or service IN, or OUT of INTEGRITY?

On Attitude  

Is the person’s attitude in line with relevant Core Human Values, Essential Behaviours, Value Cases approach, and Laws of Nature?

Is it based on 

  • Preventing the same problems from re-occurring? 
  • Motivating employees?
  • “Don’t fool clients”?

On Learning from Failure

Is the organisation’s culture one of learning from failure, or is it one hit by the same failures being repeated?

The Law of Nature Manifesto: Guidance Package

For Solving Complex Problems

What delivered needed results where our long-standing approaches failed us (examples) 

While the phone industry tried to re-invent the phone step by step, Steve Jobs ignored the common innovation processes. Instead of marginal improvements, he drove for going beyond the Tipping Point where it delivered what users really wanted. 

More in Manifesto Tutorial 3.4.4

In the Netherlands, a potato fungal disease (P. infestans) of a became  resistant to chemical treatments. It threatened the country’s yearly harvest and added ever more unwanted substances to our food.

20,000 farmers, trade organisations, scientists, and government organisations were stuck in endless discussions and finger-pointing.

Potatoe

A combination of two old methods was brought in.

Results:

  • Finger-pointing quickly changed into listening and helping each other
  • After a few workshops, the project was up and running three months later
  • The project organization: 1.5 full-time employees only
  • Budget needs: tiny
  • Goals: Achieved quicker than planned

More in Manifesto Tutorial 3.4.2.

In one family and for seven different health matters, two Laws of Nature showed the way to highly effective treatments. Examples:

  • ADHD: Daily emotional outbursts disappeared for 17 years
  • Dyslexia: After simple interventions, learning to read happened within six weeks and 10-minute exercises per day 
  • Weeks of severe back pain: With signs of it coming again, a few 1-minute exercises are sufficient to prevent it
Please help

Many others found effective treatments after official Health Services gave up

Possibility: 

From exponential growth of problems in Health Services and their consequences to ‘Flatten-the-Curve’ of:

  • People suffering 
  • Costs of Health Services
  • Structural capacity bottlenecks
  • Violence and crime, jurisdiction and imprisonment from mental matters
  • Countries undermining their competitive positions 

More in Manifesto Tutorials 1 and 2

Practices which enabled Einstein, Newton and Darwin to make their discoveries are well known or visible to us. However, where are the research, innovation and decision-making processes applying them? 

In this Manifesto 

  • Highest-impact practices of Einstein, Newton and Darwin (no mathematics needed)
  • These practices confirmed and extended by an Einstein-Newton-Darwin scientist, Prof. Michael Fitzgerald
  • Various examples of how these practices were applied to make this Manifesto possible

Result

  • This Manifesto as applying Einstein-Newton-Darwin practices was one of the foundations making it possible

More throughout the Manifesto tutorials and Manifesto Tutorials 1 and 2 in particular

When relevant elements of the Manifesto were applied 

In a specific field of service management, known for high project failure rates since the 1990’s, applying relevant elements of the Manifesto led to the following results:

  • Lack of interest and resistance changed into interest, support and demand 
  • A structural reduction and prevention of bureaucracy and complexity by resolving it at its root cause
  • Delivered on time, without escalations and costly corrections

More in Manifesto Tutorial 3.1 

5 to 25 Minute Tutorials For


Everyone

20 to 30 minutes

Those who want to know where and how to intervene

2 hours only 

Those designing and executing transformation projects 

2:30 hours only 

Tutorials

1.

Introduction & The Tipping Point Law of Nature
Answers to:
  • Why do solution attempts fail us today?
  • How did the Laws of Nature disappear from decision-making?
  • How do we reconnect with the Einstein-Newton-Darwin practices?
    • Multiple structurally different practices from how we go about tough problems today
  • What is the Tipping Point Law of Nature in one sentence?
  • How can we together get started in our own environments to solve these matters?
And
  • How we apply the Tipping Point Law of Nature without realizing it
  • The law’s huge solution potential waiting to be unleashed
  • Hard-to-ignore questions everybody can ask to guide decision-makers, their advisors and experts

2.

Answers to:
  • What would Einstein, Newton and Darwin do when faced with differences against standard practices?
    • Answers by Prof. Michael Fitzgerald 
  • What characteristics should decision-makers look for when hiring people to solve tough problems?
    • Answers by Prof. M. Fitzgerald
  • Why is the Capacity Bottleneck Law of Nature applied for the road system, but not for organizations and mental matters such as ADHD, autism and dyslexia? 
And
  • A systemic failure demanding the highest priority now
  • Why many are likely to have found effective mental health treatments after standard therapies delivered insufficient results
    • The bound-to-be missing Law-of-Nature-based link between identified causes of various mental matters and their symptoms,
    • Why urgently needed research with the missing link couldn’t get started 
  • Hard-to-ignore guiding questions you can ask when managerial, organizational, societal and therapy decisions need to be made

3.

Answers to:
  • Why do simplification projects in a box create more bureaucracy and complexity at the system level than is saved inside the box? How can this be prevented?
  • Why is a package of (simple) solutions required to solve complex problems?
And
  • The structure of the Law of Nature Manifesto’s Guidance Package
  • Hard-to-ignore guiding questions you can ask when attempts are made to solve complex problems

.

3.1

Answers to:
  • Why do communication practices that worked (well) before now trigger disbelief, resistance and opposition? 
  • What type of communications, practices and activities should be avoided?
  • What communications, practices and activities turned the previous situation into interest, support and demand?
And
  • A guiding question you can apply yourself to get people on board

Results of relevant Manifesto elements having been applied

White paper

And
  • A guiding question you can apply yourself to get people on board

White paper

.

3.2

Answers to:
  • Why have our long-standing approaches to
    • unlocking the available solutions &
    • reducing the crippling bureaucracy & 
    • reducing the overwhelming complexity
 

 failed us?  

  • What are intervention points of the highest impact we have missed?
    • Eight executable intervention points of the highest impact
Plus
  • A guiding question you can apply yourself to get people on board
And
  • Hard-to-ignore guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made 

.

3.3

Answers to:
  • What is the most impactful intervention possibility to
    • Flatten-the-Curve of the exponentially grown bureaucracy and complexity drastically? 
    • Avoid practices and ways of thinking that worsen matters and select those that solve the tough problems in our environment and beyond? 
    • Re-create trust?

A single word, derived from the Tipping Point Law of Nature

  • How can we utilize the existing bureaucracy to get this intervention possibility into decision-making?
  • How do we prevent waiting decades until the regulations, processes and the like are adjusted? 
  • How does this intervention align with popular models and science
And
  • Hard-to-ignore guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made 

.

3.4

  • The Manifesto’s foundation for solving complex problems 
  • The five elements for finding simple solutions and getting them through the system
  • Guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made

Guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made

.

3.4.1

  • How the most-damaging root causes of complex problems can be found at the system levels
  • How the solvable root causes hiding behind the identified root causes can be found
  • No need to worry about countless 2nd-level root causes and symptoms 
  • How the desired future situation can be identified

Guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made 

.

3.4.2

  • Two examples from the field: What led to Executable Solution Frameworks and needed results where our long-standing solution attempts failed us
  • A new complication undermining solutions to complex matters
  • A framework to create Executable Solution Frameworks; based on:
    • Integrating relevant Laws of Nature
    • Listening to what is really needed in the groups involved and impacted
    • What has delivered needed results where our long-standing solution attempts failed us
    • Preventing the new complication

Guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made 

Extended information about the examples provided during this tutorial:
Extended information about the examples provided during this tutorial:

Example 1 (former blog post, Dutch language): ‘Hoe de sector de aardappelziekte onder controle kreeg

Charles de Monchy’s collection of tools: ‘Collaboration in Networks, a toolbook for First Movers’. Downloadable via Luminspino.

.

3.4.3

Under development
  • The primary skill set for solving complex problems
    • Known for centuries
    • Excluded by hiring and job-advancement criteria
  • Alternatives when individuals with the primary skill set are hard to find
  • Obstacles to overcome 

Guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made 

.

3.4.4

  • Why our high-to-highest impact innovations get stuck in the system by default
  • The need to make non-technical innovation part of innovation processes
  • A complementary innovation process to unleash high-to-highest impact innovations
    • Inclusive non-technical innovation

Guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made 

.

3.4.5

  • Why new research models are needed
  • Our proposal for a research model for complex research subjects

Guiding questions you can ask when decisions are to be made 

Calls to Action

Hard-to-Ignore Questions Anyone Can Ask On the Fly

To ignite the problem-solving thinking

For work, home, health, societal and planetary matters

Guiding decision-makers, advisors and experts to impactful solutions

Intervening where the highest impact can be made at the lowest costs and risks

Under development

The Call-to-Action Series is currently in development
To receive call notifications, please sign up for the newsletter

The Manifesto's Co-Creators

A group of individuals with extensive experience in what provided needed results where our long-standing solution approaches failed us

Core Team

Netherlands, Germany

Polymath | Initiator of the Manifesto

Senior Analyst, Consultant, Inventor 

Arti Ahluwalia

India

Coordinator of Publications UN Commons Cluster NGO Major Group

Ecocivilisation Country Chair India

Director at Dimex India 

Netherlands

Former CEO

Sustainocracy: Initiative owner and author

John Scholtz

Netherlands

Program Manager

Passion for sustainability

James N. Rose

United States

Biologist (retired)

General Systems Analyst

Developer of Integrity Paradigm

Marion van den Eijnden

Netherlands

Avatar Master

Former Occupational Therapist

Elly Rijnierse

Netherlands

Senior Advisor 

Civic Leadership and democratisation in Integrated Area Development

Belgium

Journalist

Founder of Re-Story

Contributing Co-creators 

Emile (Glans) Van Essen

Netherlands

Founding Chair WORLD SUSTAINABILITY FUND 

Polymath

Many sustainability projects across the globe have received (large) funds. Emile became a co-creator when he discovered that the Law of Nature Manifesto was addressing many of the obstacles undermining the projects funded and he didn’t see anyone else doing this. 

Stephanie Barnes

Canada

Creativity for doing things differently

Prof. Manuel Casanova

United States

SmartState Endowed Chair in Childhood Translational Neurotherapeutics & Gottfried and Gisela Kolb Endowed Chair in Psychiatry (retired)

Margie Charpentier

Netherlands

Background support and out-of-the-box contributions

Prof. Michael Fitzgerald

Ireland

Einstein-Newton-Darwin Researcher

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (retired)

Zinzi Nandi König

United States

Interdisciplinary Scientist Biology, Emergency Nurse
Former professor

Ukpeme Okon

United States, Nigeria

Ambassador for Peace

Barrister

Catherine Schoendorff

Germany, France

C-Suite Coach

Former CEO

Serene Seng

Singapore

Executive Coach

Speaker

Dr. Mahendra Shah

Indonesia

Director

Co-author UN-IIASA climate change report 2002

Former IIASA scientist

Adina Tarry

United Kingdom

Polymath
Organisation & Leadership Development, HRM Strategy, Quality & Process management, Business & Consumer Psychologist, Mentor, Master Coach & Supervisor, Lecturer, Author, Speaker

Harry van der Velde

Netherlands

Holistic analysis and visualization of organizational issues

Owner, ZICHT Visie en Verbeelding

Sponsors

AiREAS Cooperative

Cooperatieve Vereniging AiREAS U.A. 

A value-driven co-operative organization: Together for clean air and health in local environments

ComDys

Website maintained by ComDyS

Experience and knowledge contributions