DRAFT

LoN-Manifesto logo
LoN-OS logo

For 2+ Decades

Available solutions with high to highest impact get stuck in the system by default

Today

Our long-standing approaches to solving the growing problems we face have failed us

Future

Bureaucracy and fixed ways of thinking prevent us from solving the problems

Possibility

An enormous solution potential is waiting to be unleashed 

A Fresh Approach is Required — But What Could Work? 

Let's have a break
Let's have a break

With hands-on experience in

what worked where our long-standing solution approaches failed,

co-creators of this Manifesto initiative applied a practice that seems to have been lost: asking Leadership Questions such as …

What do Decision-Makers REALLY NEED to make the problem-solving decisions?

What do Initiatives REALLY NEED to get their impactful solutions through the systems?

Where is the LISTENING TO what delivered needed results where our long-standing solution approaches failed?

What can Employees, Patients, and Citizens DO to get impactful solutions accepted for themselves, at work, in their environment, and beyond?

Leadership Questions

When asked, they …

Guide to where highest-impact intervention possibilities and solutions can be found

Communicate a problem-solving and trust-restoring possibility

In group settings, they …

Become hard-to-ignore 

Leadership Question
Leadership Question

When missed, negotiated away, or overruled, they …

Communicate “too much of the same thinking. Won’t work.”

Re-occurrence leads to:

Violent opposition

Arrow up right

Opposition

Arrow up right

Resistance

Arrow up right

Lack of support

Arrow up right

Lack of interest 

Co-creators of this initiative found no one in an influential or decision-making position who responded to such Leadership Questions at the level required

Not in Public Services 

Not in Business 

Not in Science

These and more Leadership Questions guided to solvable root causes, and to solutions with high-to-highest impact

Wondering how this could help … 

You and your family?

The organization you work for?

The initiative or movement you support?

The environments we all depend on?

Please select the groups of interest in the next section

To see what you can do — at the level that feels right — see the Call to Contribute section further down

Possibilities for Different Groups

— When the Challenge, Problem, Project, or Environment Is Complex —

The following groups experience the consequences differently,
yet each has intervention possibilities that strengthen those of the others

Compare this with today’s chaos of guidance and directions versus

Chaos of guidance and directions
Chaos of guidance and directions

… each group’s intervention possibilities strengthening those of the other groups

Common path
Common path
Employees

… stress, burnout, or the removal of productive positions?

… more of the same cost-savings projects and reorganizations that:

  • Have failed to deliver the needed results?
  • Are are used to finance the unnecessary costs of  bureaucracy, complexity, and project failure rates far too high?

… common yet solvable root causes of these situations remain unaddressed?

Together with your colleagues, you can ask this and other Leadership Questions, and provide the accompanying information indicating where more details can be found

More in the Call to Contribute section below

… unnecessary symptom treatment and suffering for complex physical and mental health matters when effective treatments are available today?

… ever-increasing Health Services bills?

… paying twice: through your insurance for treatments failing to deliver needed results, and a second time for unsupported treatments delivering the needed results?

… unsupported treatment(s) delivered needed results after supported treatments had delivered insufficient or no results — often at (far) lower suffering and cost

… for your treatment decision, the statement “there is no proof for such treatment” was given — while the following information wasn’t provided:

Despite strong patterns of treatments delivering needed results, research attempts were rejected or required to be conducted with research models unsuited for complex health matters.

For your treatment decisions on complex health matters, you can ask for and require a list of therapies with the research status of accepted therapies and of therapies that delivered needed results where the accepted treatments delivered insufficient results.

More information: see the Health Services Call to Action (when released),  Tutorials 1 and 2, and the first 5 minutes of Tutorial 3.4.5 

Let’s further ask: What are the charities and research funders doing to get the result-delivering therapies researched with models suited for complex health matters?

More in the Call to Contribute section below

Citizens

… the consequences of unsolved problems being offloaded to the weakest,

and this giving negative developments — which we thought were a matter of the past — the space to rise again?

… quite often, simple solutions of the highest-impact are waiting to be unleashed?

You could ask one or the other Leadership Question to get root-cause treatment going in your environment — no further knowledge required

and invite others to do the same

More in the Call to Contribute section below.

Innovators, Initiative/Project Owners

… extensive fire fighting?

… ongoing stress and burnout?

… getting stuck in the system?

… friction with clients, colleagues, executives, and funders?

… much of this can be prevented EARLY ON?

By doing this Health Check — the Health Check containing only 17 intervention possibilities grounded in common, solvable root causes typically hidden deep in the systems

By creating Executable Solution Frameworks EARLY ON (explained in Tutorial 3.4.2)

By complementing today’s innovation paths — typically designed for engineering-type solutions and, hence, stable situations — with a complementary innovation path designed for solutions to complex and dynamic situations (more in Tutorial 3.4.4)

Decision-Makers

… lack of interest, resistance, and opposition in target audiences through …

continued use of best practices, frameworks, models, trends, and ways of thinking that work well for stable environments like factories, but …

have failed — for more than two decades — to solve complex problems?

Typically missing:

  • Executability, scalability, and value realization at the system levels
  • The solvable root causes of the highest damage — at the system levels
  • Adherence to relevant Laws of Nature
  • How Einstein, Newton, and Darwin found deep insights and Laws of Nature to highly complex matters

… listening to what worked where our long-standing approaches failed could provide the breakthrough guidance?

The co-created knowledge base from what worked where our long-standing solutions failed is now available through this Law of Nature Manifesto and its complementary Operating System

… reporting at the surface?

… repeating narratives that treat symptoms?

… more of the same that missed getting to the root causes and the available solutions of our colossal problems?

… the real story may be that the solvable root causes of our colossal problems — and the impactful solutions they lead to — have been missed for decades.

They may be waiting to be unlocked, simply because our long-standing models, decision-making, and solution approaches were designed for stable situations and, hence, are unable to handle solutions designed for today’s complex and constantly changing realities.

To begin unlocking what has been missed for decades, just sign up for our Calls to Action (under development) through our Newsletter and/or our  YouTube Channel

Don’t want to wait? 

You can familiarize yourself right away with this homepage, the Fundamental Level of the Manifesto, and the complementary Operating System

Investors and Funders

… costly fire fighting,

… expensive corrections, 

… foreseeable failure?

… much of this can be prevented and success rates increased substantially with small efforts early on

… executable Solution Frameworks can be identified through a few workshops early on

By asking to verify the project against this Health Check — the Health Check containing only 17 check points grounded in common, solvable root causes typically hidden deep in the systems

By complementing today’s innovation processes — typically designed for engineering-type solutions and, hence, stable situation — with a complementary innovation process designed for complex and dynamic situations (more in Tutorial 3.4.4)

By requiring Executable Solution Frameworks EARLY ON (explained in Tutorial 3.4.2)

Executives

… what used to be state-of-the-art efficiency-improvement, cost-saving, and re-organization approaches — yet have failed for more than two decades to deliver the needed results in complex environments?

AND 

  • Kept project failure rates at unacceptable levels,
  • Made bureaucracy and complexity grow exponentially,
  • Weakened competitive positions,
  • Changed prospering companies into troubled companies,
  • Made once-prospering companies disappear from the surface of the Earth?

… the damage created now provides the highest-impact intervention possibilities for efficiency improvements, and competitive advantage through:

  • Solvable common and environment-specific root causes of the highest damage — located outside the boundaries of the long-standing approaches
  • These root causes guiding to impactful solutions such as
    • A simple policy — based on a single word — guiding everyone to  practices that worked where the long-standing practices failed
    • This policy providing the highest-impact solution for the unnecessary bureaucracy, and complexity, as well as high failure rates

You could instruct your advisors and experts to do quick Health Checks — only 17 check points grounded in common, solvable root causes typically hidden deep in the systems

You could create a position with the goals to stop this waste of budgets and resources, and to enable impactful solutions to get through the system again

Politicians

… any of the following through  expressions, actions, priorities, or decisions?

  • Too much of the same thinking that created the colossal problems we face,
  • Symptom treatment,
  • Project failure rates too high,
  • Conflicts with relevant Laws of Nature — laws that cannot be overruled, missed, or negotiated away,
  • “I cannot keep my promises because the environment changes quicker than I can deliver”? 

… their root causes — located outside the boundaries of the long-standing approaches — can actually be resolved

… listening to what is REALLY NEEDED is on its way to becoming the benchmark for effective communication

… there is a trust-restoring possibility

… a simple policy — based on a single word:

  • Guides to the practices that worked where the long-standing practices failed
  • Provides the highest-impact solution possibility for the exponentially grown but unnecessary bureaucracy and complexity, as well as the high project failure rates

You could ask projects and decisions to be verified against this this Health Check — the Health Check containing only 17 intervention possibilities grounded in common, solvable root causes typically hidden deep in the systems

You could demand today’s innovation processes and associated rules — typically designed for engineering-type innovations and, hence, unsuited for complex and quickly changing situations — to be complemented with an innovation process designed for complex and dynamic situations (more in Tutorial 3.4.4)

To restore trust quickly, you could — in combination with solutions to the most-damaging root causes — apply Adaptive Integrity of Manifesto intervention 7.B 

Initiatives and Movements

… waste resources trying to retain volunteers and make a declining support base grow again?

… use practices and communication techniques that signal “more of the same that has been tried before”?

  • Using expressions and practices that — only a few years ago — brought people on board, but are now associated with “failure likely”
  • Assuming that what worked in a small environment, or in a world gone by, will also work in today’s highly complex environments
  • Initiative design and communications based on studies suggesting that getting x% of the target audience on board is sufficient for a movement to succeed — while recent movement attempts have become stuck in the system by default

… demonstrate helplessness or engage in disturbing activities?

… demand that decision-makers make the problem-solving decisions when they do not know how:

  1. The experts and institutions — expected to provide what decision-makers and initiatives REALLY NEEDhave been unable to deliver this guidance
  2. The ability to listen to what delivered needed results where our long-standing solution approaches failed has been lost
  3. Individuals with the skill set for solving complex problems have been excluded by hiring and job-advancement processes for two decades

get stuck in the system?

… there is an “easy” way to guide decision-makers and their advisors to:

  • Where they can find high-to-highest impact solutions
  • Make the problem-solving decisions

… when the “easy” way reduces the mountains of obstacles standing in the way of their work — and of your Initiative or Movement

… your Initiative or Movement could be designed for executability, scalability, and value realization at the desired system level — and aligned with today’s realities

By inviting your supporters, associated initiatives and movements to bring Leadership Questions directly into the decision-making of organizations. For more information, see Levels 1 & 2 in the Call to Contribute section below.  

By doing this Health Check for your initiative or movement — a Health Check containing only 17 checkpoints grounded in common, solvable root causes typically hidden deep in the systems

By creating Executable Solution Frameworks EARLY ON, or when you need to get out of troubled situations (explained in Tutorial 3.4.2)

… the competitive position through the exponential growth of non-productive matters such as:

  • A crippling internal bureaucracy
  • An environment changing quicker than rules, documentation, processes, and IT-tools can be updated
  • A broken communication bridge between headquarters, departments, and locations — preventing
    • The Enterprise knowledge from being unlocked,
    • Agile yet reliable decisions from being made across departments
  • Individuals with the skill set your business may need for solving complex problems being excluded by hiring and job-advancement procedures
  • Impactful innovations being excluded by the innovation process

… impactful solutions to all these matters are available today

… you are free to use solution elements from this Manifesto initiative, your own, or those of third parties

The package of this Manifesto and Operating System offers complementary solution elements to all these matters

The package designed to 

  • Prevent falling back into old habits
  • The complementary nature of the solution elements creating a far greater value than each element could achieve on its own
  • Unlock far-reaching spin-off possibilities
Public Services

… capacity bottlenecks ‘everywhere’?

… high project failure rates?

… a crippling bureaucracy and overwhelming complexity?

… Individuals with the skill set your organization may need for solving complex problems being excluded by hiring and job-advancement processes?

… impactful solutions and innovations being excluded by processes and rules designed for stable situations — while the environment is complex and changes quickly?

… impactful solutions to all these matters are available today — including a simple directive for root-cause treatment of unnecessary bureaucracy, complexity, and high project failure rates

… and this freeing up resources and budget for the tasks public services are expected to provide

While you are free to use your own or third party solution elements:

The package of this Manifesto and Operating System providing complementary solution elements of high-to-highest impact to all these matters

The package designed to 

  • Prevent falling back into old habits
  • The complementary nature of the solution elements creating a far greater value than each element could achieve on its own
  • Unlock far-reaching spin-off possibilities

… ever-increasing cost savings pressures,

… structural Capacity Bottlenecks ‘everywhere?’

… medical positions being reduced to finance unnecessary bureaucracy,

… giving up on patients when research into therapies with strong patterns of delivering needed results — where accepted treatments failed — is rejected by the research system through: 

  • “The science model we have at the moment is not fit for purpose”
    (Einstein-Newton-Darwin researcher M. Fitzgerald) 1
  • Research models overruling fundamental principles of science:
    • Seeking the truth (for example, through the Leadership Questions
    • Applying Einstein-Newton-Dawin practices (a systemic approach)
    • Applying relevant Laws of Nature — especially when they cannot be expressed in exact ways (this Manifesto)

… patients paying twice: through their insurances for treatments failing to deliver needed results, and a second time for unsupported treatments delivering the needed results,

… the indirect suffering and the enormous costs of unnecessary mental matters — from productivity loss at work up to vandalism, crime, and imprisonment?

… two huge sources to

  • re-create healthy Health Services,
  • reduce the suffering,
  • reduce he associated costs

for all these matters are waiting to be unlocked through:

  1. Reducing unnecessary bureaucracy and capacity bottlenecks drastically — at their most damaging yet solvable root causes  
  2. Treatments with strong patterns of repeatedly delivering needed results where accepted treatments failed 2

By applying relevant practices of the Tipping Point and Capacity Bottleneck Laws of Nature, as outlined further down, and in Tutorials 1 to 3.3

By responding to the Health Call to Action (when available): an example of extreme treatment costs, extreme suffering, and long-term treatment — versus the patient fully recovered within months and having to pay for that treatment himself.

By developing research models suited for complex matters through applying the overruled principles of science.

For a model proposal see Tutorial 3.4.5 and for the missing principles Manifesto intervention 4.A 

1 Michael Fitzgerald. Psychiatry and Einstein-Newton-Darwin researcher. Trinity College. Dublin. Retired. In Manifesto Tutorial 2.

2 See Tutorials 1, 2 and 3.4.5 

Science

… through:

1. 

Theoretical models, having failed1 for more than two decades on complex matters, to

  • Demonstrate executability, scalability, and system-level value realization in organizations and systems
  • Listen to the solvable root causes of the highest damage — at the system levels,
  • Listen to what delivered results where the long-standing models failed and further Leadership Questions provided throughout this Manifesto?

2. 

Fundamental principles of science2 being overruled when the problem to solve involves complex matters?

3. 

Scientists demanding that scientific facts be adhered to in this very situation?

… while this combination continues to undermine the credibility of science at large?

… lost trust can be restored 

By solving points 1 to 3:

  • To the levels required for executability, scalability, and system-level value realization in organizations and systems
  • At the speed and with the priorities demanded by the colossal problems around us

Through

  • Responding to the Leadership Questions (see above, the ‘why … when’ questions, all Tutorials, and the Collection of Leadership Questions)  
  • Acting with an integrity that also works for complex situations and when environments change faster than promises can be delivered:

Adaptive Integrity

(see Manifesto Intervention 7.B)

1 Failure of models:

2 Fundamental principles of science:

Call to Contribute — At Any Level That Feels Right

Let’s create an irresistible force by bringing 
Leadership Questions directly into decision-making in your environment

Through

Simply sharing Calls to Action providing Leadership Questions anyone can ask 

Contribution a piece
Contribution a piece

Up to

Co-creation of impactful solution packages

You can simply:

  • Share the Calls to Action as they become available
  • Invite others to share the calls  
  • Invite others to ask the Leadership Questions that come with each Call to Action

Want to know how missing the Tipping Point Law may impact your life? Watch Tutorials 1 and 2   

Level 2

In addition to Level 1, you can simply:

  • Ask the Leadership Questions that come with each Call to Action — and point to the Call where they can find links to further information
  • Encourage open dialogue that brings Fresh Thinking to the surface

Example questions to prevent costly mistakes and foreseeable failure:

  • Will the decision to be made improve or worsen the health of people, the organization, the environment, or the planet
  • What Laws of Nature could apply? What practices do they demand?
  • Why accept high costs and risks when a simple health check can substantially reduce them?

Optional

Level 3

At this level, the door to fresh thinking is opened. In your environment, you ask relevant Leadership Questions that guide decision-makers, advisors, and experts toward fresh insights and highest-impact solutions — while sparking meaningful dialogue. You might want to make it visible by doing the exercise in Tutorial 3.3.

You are free to use your own approaches, practices, and tools, or those of third parties. However, there are a few requirements:

  • Relevant root causes, gaps and conflicts identified through this Manifesto initiative, as well as environment-specific ones are addressed
  • What is being done is in line with relevant Laws of Nature, Core Human Values, and Essential Behaviours
  • The Integrity Law and its practice, Adaptive Integrity, are applied

A personal goal could be:

  • Get a problem-solving activity or project initiated

Direct links …

Level 4

At Level 4, an Executable Solution Framework is co-created for a specific task or project. This can be done by yourself or together with individuals who have the necessary experience and skills.

In addition to Level 3, the following applies:

Requirements:

  • The Solution Framework includes Manifesto-based education and coaching needs (or third-party alternatives that meet these requirements) for involved decision-makers, their advisors, task or project members, as well as target audiences
  • The Solution Framework is confirmed by knowledgeable representatives of the groups involved and impacted as executable and scalable, and there is reasonable certainty that the value proposition will materialize at the desired system level.

Your goals could be

  • Get an Executable Solution Framework created
  • Obtain approval for project design and execution

Direct links …

Level 5

Why accepting:

  • Ongoing firefighting, stress, and burnout
  • High failure rates that drain time and resources
  • A crippling bureaucracy and capacity bottlenecks everywhere — like skill shortages
  • Blame, frustration, and shame
  • Risks to your role and credibility
  • What delivered needed results where our long-standing solution approaches failed us
  • A simple policy to reduce bureaucracy, capacity bottlenecks, and high project failure rates at their most damaging root cause
  • Easy-to-apply Laws of Nature — often highest-impact solutions at a fraction of the usual costs and risks

1.

Invest 2–4 hours to explore this homepage, the intervention and solution possibilities under the menu options Manifesto and Manifesto ++ / OS, and watch the tutorials that may be relevant

2.

Get somebody with the mindset of “what worked where our long-standing solution attempts failed us” into a leading position, and take on the responsibility to:

  • Free up time, resources, and budgets wasted by approaches optimized for a world gone by — but keep what works well
  • Guide the organization toward “what has worked where our long-standing approaches have failed” — as opposed to “what is the best practice, model, or framework?”

Or become this person yourself.

3.

This person has the skill set to solve complex problems — or is coached by someone who does

Direct links…

Why Our Long-Standing Solution Approaches Failed Us

Most damaging — yet solvable — Root Causes remain unresolved

Iceberg and Root Causes
Iceberg and Root Causes
  • The one-word policy to solve the crippling bureaucracy at its most damaging root cause is missing

By publishing the word and its implications as a top-level policy, bureaucracy itself can be used to bring it into decision-making at all levels — and to drastically reduce bureaucracy to healthy levels.

Before the word can be made available, its context needs to be established. This is provided through the Manifesto’s tutorials.

  • More Root Causes below

Popular expressions trigger:
Same Thinking — Won’t Work

Disbelief
Disbelief

These expressions may still work for the own group, but trigger “won’t work” when used with other groups.

As soon as three or more groups have to work together, adjusting the expressions to each target group no longer works.

Example groups 

  • Initiatives and movements: let’s connect or share, start small and grow, by the heart, co-create
  • Employees: common sense, agile decisions, root cause
  • Decision-makers, experts, and advisors: decisions by money, break into parts, method, and proof

What works in small environments gets stuck when scaled up.

Climbing over wall versus mountain
Climbing over wall versus mountain

Solutions, models, best practices, and IT tools are typically designed for a few parts of a complex problem — and miss the mountains of obstacles that appear when scaled up.

The same root causes
across industries, fields, and subjects

Quite often, simple solution possibilities
 are waiting to be used

Universally applicable — when a part or the whole is COMPLEX 

  • Aviation
  • Business services
  • Construction
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Health Services
  • IT
  • Public services
  • Manufacturing
  • Science
  • Social enterprises

     And more

  • Agility 
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • Best practices & Methods
  • Education
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Human Resources
  • Indigenous knowledge
  • Innovation
  • Knowledge Management
  • Land use
  • Management
  • Natural Earth Systems
  • Organisations
  • Politics
  • Project management
  • Research
  • SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)
  • Societal matters
  • Youth & Children

      And more

  • Agile yet reliable decision-making
  • Artificial Intelligence: Downside prevention
  • Automation
    • Beneficial versus counterproductive 
  • Bureaucracy & Complexity reduction
  • Cooperation & Co-creation
  • Circular economies: Making them happen
  • Education and skill gaps
  • Fixed ways of thinking & Behaviour
  • Food security
  • Health of
    • People
    • Projects, organizations and  environments
    • Planet
  • Innovation
    • High(est)-impact getting stuck by default
    • Out-of-the-box, social and organizational  
  • Marine life
  • Safety
  • Security
  • Trust: (Re-)creating trust
  • Truth finding
  • Productivity improvements
  • Project failure rates far to high
  • SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)
  • Social and organisational innovation needs
  • Water security

       And more

Needed: A Reliable Foundation to Create a Common Path

Common path
Common path

A Manifesto

Providing the highest-impact intervention possibilities

An Operating System 

Like Windows, Android, or iOS — but enabling healthy societal, organizational, and planetary systems

Based on …

Something powerful enough that it cannot be rejected

Intervening where …

The highest impact can be made at the lowest costs and risks — at the system level

Complete enough …

To turn today’s chaos of guidance and directions into a common path

Enabling decision-makers and initiative owners to …

Make the problem-solving decisions

Get impactful solutions through the systems with high speed and reliability

Emile van Essen, Founding Chair of World Sustainability Fund:

As far as I know, this is the only initiative worldwide responding to the following at the level required:

  1. What prevents us from unleashing the available solutions?
  2. Where and how do we have to intervene to unleash the solutions of high-to-highest impact within the deadlines set by Nature and deadlines agreed on by international treaties?

Nature’s Guidance

Nature
Nature

.

We Are All Part of Nature

So are the organizations we work for, the environments around us, and the systems we have created

Nature thrives when the environment is healthy

Nature’s Laws are present or occur

Nature’s Laws cannot be overruled, ignored, negotiated away, or changed by human will

It does not matter whether these Laws still need to be identified, require adjustment to the latest findings, or are expressed in exact, verbal, or illustrative ways — they are present or occur

No mathematics is needed for the main Laws
 guiding us out of the Polycrisis 

The end of the tunnel
The end of the tunnel

.

A few Laws of Nature — overruled, denied, or overlooked — guide us out of the devastating situation

Birds
Birds

.

The only solution left and powerful enough to solve the existential threats we face may be:

The (re-)integration of Relevant Laws of Nature
in Decision-Making

Before Nature’s guidance can be used

Action Paths

Level 3

Three Solvable Root Causes of Devastating Consequences

The problems and SDGs
The problems and SDGs

When mainstream decision-making changed to decision-making by hard numbers, money, and linear practices ‘only’, information of critical importance — that could not be expressed this way — became invisible and treated as irrelevant

Alongside high failure rates, stress, and burnout, this created so-called management failures — while decision-makers and their advising experts believed they were applying state-of-the-art practices. 

Solvable Root Causes: see root causes 2 and 3

These mainstream practices are hereafter referenced as exact practices

In the wake of Root Cause 1, we lost the ability to apply two groups of Laws that match the above criteria for Laws of Nature

  • Laws from physics, chemistry, etc. — when a Tipping Point of Complexity is crossed, and they can no longer be expressed through exact practices
  • Laws impossible to express in exact ways

Solvable Root Causes

  • The Tipping Point Law of Nature applied to complex matters: missing ‘everywhere’ — see water example below
  • The missing education of decision-makers and experts in the Laws of Nature relevant to their fields — when these Laws cannot be expressed in exact ways

In the wake of Root Cause 1 … 

  • Individuals with the skill set to solve complex problems have been — unintentionally — excluded from hiring and job-advancement processes for two decades
  • Our children — who may have developed several such skills — have been, and continue to be, directed away from this skill set and into the exact skill set dominating our educational systems

This has led to few — or no — individuals in influential and decision-making positions with the ability to see highly effective solutions and get them through the systems. More to this in Manifesto Tutorial 3.4.3.

Example

  1. A public call is received for impactful or innovative solutions. It says out-of-the-box welcome.
  2. A submission follows after days or weeks of effort.
  3. Standard response: “Interesting! Can you now adjust it so it fits our processes and ways of thinking?”

One Law of Nature Stands Out Above All Others  

With water — and in countless other situations — we apply this Law without realizing it is, in fact, a Law of Nature. 

Tipping Point

The Tipping Point Law:

“When a Tipping Point is crossed, something fundamental changes”

How we apply this Law in organizations

We adjust our practices according to the state — solid, liquid, or gas. The same applies to other substances

Further Tipping Points:

  • Those of climate change
  • When the demand for a resource grows beyond its capacity (→ traffic jams, full agendas, waiting lists, etc.)
  • When well-working communication practices turn into “too much of the same thinking, won’t work”

Other expressions for Tipping Points:

  • Phase shifts
  • Break points
  • Inflection points
  • Trigger points
Tipping Points of Water

Beyond the Tipping Points of increasing Complexity, the Tipping Point Law demands different practices. 

Practices beyond Tipping Points
Tipping Points for organizations

Until about the turn of the century, switching to the suited practices happened automatically. It happened through practices that used to be integral to decision-making when exact practices could not provide reliable outcomes. These practices were called Common (Business) Sense and Intuition.

When Root Causes 1 to 3 manifested themselves

Applying exact practices beyond the Level 1 and even Level 2 Tipping Points became common. This happened because the Tipping Point Law was not identified as a Law of Nature — let alone for complexity.

This led to the new trends of agility and self-organization, with their open and non-linear practices. However, those approaches also missed the Tipping Points. They are now criticized just as much as the traditional best practices and models.

Practices beyond Tipping Points
Tipping Points for organizations

The systems — within which the problems at the top of this page must be solved — are now beyond the Level-2 Tipping Point.

 

Beyond this Tipping Point, the systems …

  • Reject solvable Root Causes of the highest damage from being seen, accepted, and solved
  • Reject high-to-highest impact solutions
  • Drain yet more budget, time, and resources from the small and zero-budget initiatives providing high- to highest-impact solutions
Consequences of Tipping Points missed

Patterns of systems and organizations being beyond the Level-2 Tipping Point:

  • Ongoing cost-saving pressures and regular reorganizations
  • Productive people losing their jobs; vacated productive positions being removed
  • Unsolved problems offloaded to the weakest in the system
  • Divided populations

Effort and cost consequences & Solution Possibility

The Tipping Point and Capacity Bottleneck Laws of Nature provide the practices needed to get this solved. A single word tells when a switch from exact / linear practices to open practices is needed — and when the reverse applies.

The Law of Nature Manifesto & Operating System

Level 3

Various practices to open fixed ways of thinking

Some visible, others emerging through the interactions between Manifesto and OS elements

A knowledge base of concise yet highest-impact insights and solutions

Natural process flows, Core Human Values, Essential Behaviours, etc.

Select what is relevant for the situation at hand — ignore the rest

Available from this webpage for immediate use

Free use —including free commercial use (Creative Commons licenses apply) 1

The LoN Manifesto+OS in only 30 minutes to 5 hours  1

(The 5 hours for implementation experts)

1 The pages under these menu options: Home, Calls to Action, Manifesto, and Manifesto+OS,  including short tutorials.
Extra time may be needed for the calls to Action and downloadable add-ons.

The Manifesto's Co-Creators

A group of independent individuals with extensive experience in what delivered needed results where our long-standing solution approaches failed us.

When they could not find anyone in businesses, public services, or universities responding at the levels required — for making impactful solutions executable, scalable, and durable at the system levels — they took on the challenge. It led to the LoN Manifesto + Operating System.

Netherlands, Germany

Polymath 
Initiator and main Analyst of the Manifesto
Consultant, Inventor 

Arti Ahluwalia

India

Polymath
Coordinator of Publications UN Commons Cluster NGO Major Group
Ecocivilisation Country Chair India
Director at Dimex India

Stephanie Barnes

Canada

Creativity for doing things differently

Sharon Bowes

Canada

Life of Meaning Strategist
Nature’s Wisdom Strategist

Prof. Manuel Casanova

United States

SmartState Endowed Chair in Childhood Translational Neurotherapeutics & Gottfried and Gisela Kolb Endowed Chair in Psychiatry (retired)

Margie Charpentier

Netherlands

Background support and out-of-the-box contributions

Netherlands

Former CEO
Sustainocracy: Initiative owner and author

Emma de Klerk

Netherlands

Translater
Creative Illustrator

Jennifer Fiedler

United States

Coach
Catalyst 
Filmmaking Mentor

Prof. Michael Fitzgerald

Ireland

Einstein-Newton-Darwin Researcher
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (retired)

James N. Rose

United States

Biologist (retired)
General Systems Analyst
Developer of Integrity Paradigm

Belgium

Journalist
Founder of Re-Story

Elly Rijnierse

Netherlands

Senior Advisor 
Civic Leadership and democratisation in Integrated Area Development

Ukpeme Okon

United States, Nigeria

Barrister
Ambassador for Peace

Catherine Schoendorff

Germany, France

C-Suite Coach
Former CEO

John Scholtz

Netherlands

Program Manager
Passion for sustainability

Serene Seng

Singapore

Executive Coach
Speaker

Dr. Mahendra Shah

Indonesia

Director
Co-author UN-IIASA climate change report 2002
Former IIASA scientist

Adina Tarry

United Kingdom

Polymath
Organisation & Leadership Development, HRM Strategy, Quality & Process management, Business & Consumer Psychologist, Mentor, Master Coach & Supervisor, Lecturer, Author, Speaker

Marion van den Eijnden

Netherlands

Avatar Master
Former Occupational Therapist

Harry van der Velde

Netherlands

Holistic analysis and visualization of organizational issues
Owner, ZICHT Visie en Verbeelding

Emile (Glans) Van Essen

Netherlands

Founding Chair WORLD SUSTAINABILITY FUND 
Polymath
Many sustainability projects across the globe have received (large) funds. Emile became a co-creator when he discovered that the Law of Nature Manifesto was addressing many of the obstacles undermining the projects funded and he didn’t see anyone else doing this.